People are malnourished and starving and yet countries like
Canada still have supply management based marketing boards,an organization that
holds a monopoly on the marketing of an agricultural commodity, such as dairy,
poultry, eggs, etc. Producers, i.e. farmers,
are required to sell their product to the marketing board or must follow the
rules imposed by the board. In the case
of supply managed boards the farmer must purchases quotas. Any surplus production must be disposed
of. So in order to follow rules of a failed
system put in place several decades ago, Canadian farmers are pouring milk down
the drain.
I recently read an article published by the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation, it was written by Janyce McGregor and she feels that
we cannot get rid of our marketing boards.
But she’s wrong. First off, it’s
believed that supply management create stable and predictable prices. Canadians pay higher prices and there is very
little competition in the market place.
All other business entrepreneurs are told to sink or swim and a farm is a
business, so why do tax payers continue to support them. Many feel it is too expensive
to purchase back the quotas. Australia
did it with a simple tax to consumers and once the cost was paid, the tax was
removed. Simple changes turn into a huge
effort because of a complicated multilevel legislation that involves our
federal and provincial governments.
Don’t consumers have a say? Canadians
are continually told to make better food choices, but most of these are controlled
by marketing boards, who continue to set the price out of reach for even
Canada’s poor. It’s hard to buy milk and
bread, when pop and chips are cheaper.
Marketing boards were put in place to accomplish the
following objective: create conditions
where farm families would make income that were comparable to the “average
Canadian” family, to boost the farm’s income, to assist in stabilizing income
on the farm, and to allow more farmers to keep the “family farm”. A marketing board is not going to increase a
family’s income to the level we are seeing in Canada. Most spouses go out and work off the farm in
order to increase the family income.
Only those boards that have supply management powers can affect the
farm’s ability to increase its income, but it would all be dependent on quotas
and circumstance. If you have owned the
quotas for generations or took out a loan to increase your quotas, interest
rates are going to have a profound effect on the farm’s income.
Only supply managed marketing boards are going to have stability in
their market place, they are after all a legalized cartel. And let’s face it farming is hard work, just
like any other business and operations shut down whether there is a marketing
board in place or not. Farmers are
closing up shop globally, not just here in Canada.
It’s time to give the consumer a voice. Most of us want fairly priced Canadian grown
commodities. We want to make more
healthy choices when we are filling the grocery store cart. Farmers should be treated right globally, we have no business subsidizing Canadian Farmers in order to keep global prices lower. Market place competition is good and it’s
fair to all consumers. Case in point, a
local store in the province of New Brunswick, advertised milk on sale in its
weekly flyer. The milk was from another
province. The milk was not allowed to be
sold as advertised. Governments across
the country spend thousands in advertising, telling people to eat better and
get fit. But a Dairy marketing board
prevents young moms from purchasing milk at “on sale” price. Just as they force farmers to toss their
excess milk down the sink.
The boards came about to try and solve problems, to get the
production to meet the demand for farm goods.
I’m not blind I can see the demand is greater than the supply, but only if
you pay for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment